The Stockholm Environment Institute is an international not-for-profit research organization that has been engaged in environment and development issues at local, national, regional and global policy levels for 25 years.
Our goal is to bring about change for sustainable development by bridging science and policy. We do this by conducting integrated analysis that supports decision-makers.
SEI's work is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing upon engineering, economics, ecology, ethics, operations research, international relations and software design.
We work all around the world building capacity for integrated sustainability planning through training and collaboration on projects.
A supply-side approach to fossil fuels
Phasing out U.S. federal fossil fuel leases could yield real climate benefits
A new SEI analysis shows fossil fuel consumption equivalent to more than 100 million tonnes CO2 per year could be avoided by 2030 – and more in later years.
U.S. fossil fuel production is at an all-time high, up by 20% in energy terms since 2010. The U.S. now ranks first in the world in oil and gas, and second in coal production. About a quarter of the fuels being extracted, including two-fifths of all coal, come from lands and waters leased to producers by the federal government.
These leasing systems have been in place for generations and are a significant source of government revenue. Yet the capital-intensive investments they enable can "lock in" coal, oil and gas production at high levels for decades to come, making it more difficult and expensive to transition to cleaner, low-carbon alternatives.
At the same time, President Obama has made climate change a policy priority. He's moving fast to ratify the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep global warming "well below 2°C" and try to stay closer to 1.5°C. In his 2016 State of the Union address, he said we need "to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources, so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet".
As part of a review of the federal coal program, the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI), which oversees the fossil fuel leasing systems, is considering a possible declining schedule of leases "consistent with the United States' climate goals and commitments". The administration is also looking at its offshore oil and gas leasing program, and could take climate considerations into account there as well. U.S. Senators Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) have also introduced legislation that would stop all future leasing activity.
Climate and energy policy observers sometimes argue that supply-side measures like this are ineffectual, because even if fossil fuel production goes down in one place, someone else will quickly fill the gap — a "whack-a-mole" effect. Yet a new analysis from SEI, using standard economic modelling tools and data from recent studies suggests that phasing out federal fossil fuel leases could make a real difference.
"Even after accounting for increased production elsewhere, and after considering that, for example, some coal will be replaced by added gas, we found fossil fuel consumption would drop enough to reduce CO2 emissions by more than 100 million metric tons in 2030," says Peter Erickson, a senior scientist in SEI's U.S. Center in Seattle and lead author of the study. "That is a substantial benefit – greater than that of several of the policies the Obama administration has proposed in its Climate Action Plan."
For comparison, the Obama administration estimates that new fuel-efficiency standards for light-duty vehicles will save 200 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year in 2030; fuel-efficiency standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, 60 million tonnes CO2e, and regulations to control methane leaks from oil and gas operations, 13 million tonnes CO2e. The Clean Power Plan would save about 600 million tonnes CO2e.
"The scale of impact suggests that this a policy option worth exploring further," says Michael Lazarus, director of SEI's U.S. Center and co-author of the study. "Combined with other measures, it could help bring U.S. fossil fuel production down to levels more consistent with a 2°C pathway, which we estimate requires a 40–60% reduction from current levels. Under current policies, production is expected to rise by 11%."